| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ventura_Kid
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
Posts: 2351
Location: Malibu Beach, California
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:16 pm Post subject: I broke my signature and I don't care |
 |
|
I just realized that it's not all about the numbers!
Well... actually I broke my signature  and now I don't know if I have a Lot of finds or not.
I'm too tired to figure out how to fix it.... so now I have X finds. 
_________________
| FishPOET wrote: | | No maybe about it, you are too sensitive. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GarminArmin
Joined: May 06, 2003
Posts: 211
Location: West Lancaster
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| X is not bad at least you have 10 finds |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ShowStop
Joined: Oct 27, 2003
Posts: 1347
Location: Simi Valley
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
The current code is this:
| Code: | | http://www.geocaching.com/stats/img%20aspx?uid=a04eb265-f797-4143-8455-93db6617f727&bg=1&bg=1b&txt=It%27s+ALL+About+the+Numbers&bg=2 |
You need to change it to this:
| Code: | | http://www.geocaching.com/stats/img.aspx?uid=a04eb265-f797-4143-8455-93db6617f727&bg=1&bg=1b&txt=It%27s+ALL+About+the+Numbers&bg=2 |
_________________
"This is not the end. This is not the beginning of the end. This is the end of the beginning." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CodeSlapper
Joined: Sep 09, 2003
Posts: 877
Location: Chino Hills
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sly, very sly... X is a variable able to represent any number. No matter how many finds someone else has you can always say 'X' is higher. Nice try... we are on to you...
_________________
-J()by
v2.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tozainamboku
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Posts: 652
Location: Sherman Oaks
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CodeSlapper wrote: | | Sly, very sly... X is a variable able to represent any number. No matter how many finds someone else has you can always say 'X' is higher. Nice try... we are on to you... |
Yes. The famous Ogara inequality:
x > Emc^2
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CodeSlapper
Joined: Sep 09, 2003
Posts: 877
Location: Chino Hills
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't Einstein mention something about as EMC aproaches VK, time slows, space contracts and mass becomes infinite... the physical version Zeno's Paradox which states that no matter how close EMC gets to VK... EMC still has 1/2 of the remaining caches to find. 
_________________
-J()by
v2.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EMC
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
Posts: 1253
Location: Northridge, CA, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have I already violated the laws of physics by being #3 temporarily?
Is my caching approaching the speed of light?
:eyecrazy:
_________________
EMC of Northridge, CA
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tozainamboku
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Posts: 652
Location: Sherman Oaks
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EMC wrote: | Have I already violated the laws of physics by being #3 temporarily?
Is my caching approaching the speed of light?
:eyecrazy: |
No, you just were observing Ogara's Uncertainty Principle. x is changing so fast that sometimes when you measure it appears to have stopped changing. Ogara's Uncertainty Principle is sometimes refered to as the "Ventura Kids have quit" phenomenon.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Firehouse
Joined: Sep 02, 2003
Posts: 497
Location: Riverside, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You need to start all over to fix it! 
_________________
Thanks,
Dave
(Firehouse16) Still caching slowly buy surely.
http://socalrailfan.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
